Home / Archive / Letters / Use Thorium instead of more radioactive Uranium

Use Thorium instead of more radioactive Uranium

Wayne Stroessner, WICEC Past President

Aug. 19, 2008
Google plus Linkedin Pinterest
To the Editor:

An alternative to the archaic method of producing nuclear energy from Uranium/Plutonium is to use Thorium. (Nukes in Wisconsin Not Likely - Shepherd Express - August 14, 2008) 

Because Thorium is not a fissile material: There is no danger of a melt-down or nuclear proliferation because it is not suitable for the production of weapon grade materials in fact we should be able to share information with our “enemies.”

Thorium reactors: Produce minimal radioactive waste; Can burn Plutonium waste from traditional nuclear reactors with additional energy output; Do not require reprocessing of the fuel; Fuel can remain in the reactor during the reactor's life of 30-40 years - after that the core could be transferred into a new reactor; Can reduce waste by 80 to 90 %; Waste is not dangerous after 50 years whereas present nuclear waste is dangerous for thousands of years.     

Thorium facts: The energy contained in one kilogram of Thorium equals that of four thousand tons of coal; Since Thorium is not a fissile material, it must be "bombarded" with neutrons which can be supplies by cyclotrons or - better yet - by waste from spent fuel from our present nuclear plants; The global Thorium reserves could cover the world’s energy needs for thousands of years; The USA has an estimated 160,000 tons of Thorium - mostly in Idaho; Based on today’s $115 per barrel of crude, the USA has the equivalent of $393 trillion in Thorium energy.

Wayne Stroessner, WICEC Past President


Are you upset by the way the NFL and the team owners have treated Colin Kaepernick?

Getting poll results. Please wait...